Any questions ?

Please email questions to shalot@tov/com

Notice: Test mode is enabled. While in test mode no live donations are processed.

$ 0
Select Payment Method

Truth is a Good, but Elusive, Idea

In courts of law, witnesses are sworn to tell, “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.” The phrase first appears in its modern form in 1618 in Michael Dalton’s The Countrey Justice, and was likely already in oral and manuscript use in English courts by the late 1500s.

From that point forward, it became the standard witness oath in both English and American legal systems.

Abrahamic Religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) assert definitive truth claims, disclosed by God through scripture, prophecy, and history. For Jews it’s the covenant; Christians look to Christ as “the way, the truth, and the light;” Muslims look to the Qur’an as God’s final and uncorrupted revelation of truth.

Daoism and Zen explicitly deny that “truth” can be captured in language. Buddhism treats “truths” as expedient means rather than revelations. An “expedient means” is a provisional truth, something functionally true because it helps a person awaken, though not absolutely true in itself. This concept ties well into Ernest Becker’s thesis, that the entire structure of human culture, including religion, art, science, morality, and nationalism, functions as an unconscious defense mechanism against the fear of death. Think about that. The entire structure of human culture is not absolutely true in itself.

Is Truth an Achievable Goal?


Truth is only partially achievable. We approach it without ever fully grasping it due to the inherent limitations of human cognition, language, observation, and reasoning. While aspects of truth can be accessed and verified, total or absolute truth remains beyond reach.


Arguments for Achievability


In specific and delimited contexts, we successfully achieve truth every day. Scientific inquiry routinely uncovers reliable and verifiable truths—such as confirming a historical event, measuring a chemical reaction, or solving a mathematical problem.


Scientific progress itself demonstrates cumulative truth-seeking. Newton's laws of motion described gravity accurately within certain limits, and Einstein's relativity later refined—but did not negate—those truths. Such refinements show that although understanding evolves, earlier truths retain validity within their domains.


Epistemology—the philosophical study of knowledge—provides tools for pursuing truth. Rational inquiry, skepticism, falsification, and peer review help minimize error. Socratic dialogue, for instance, uncovers assumptions and contradictions, sharpening understanding and clarifying what is true.


Arguments Against Full Achievability


Although we can reach partial truths, full and absolute truth is unattainable for multiple reasons:

  • Gödel’s incompleteness theorems: Within any consistent formal system, there are true statements that cannot be proven. This means truth always exceeds our capacity to demonstrate it.
  • Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle: At the quantum level, one cannot know certain pairs of properties with arbitrary precision. Reality itself places limits on what can be known.
  • Human cognitive biases: Confirmation bias, motivated reasoning, memory distortion, and limited perception skew our interpretations and lead to provisional or mistaken “truths.”
  • Historical fallibility: Many widely accepted truths have later been overturned—such as geocentrism, phlogiston theory, or the idea that ulcers were caused solely by stress.
  • Infinite regress of justification: To know something with absolute certainty, one would need an infinite chain of justified reasons—an impossibility.

Defining Reality in Philosophy

Reality, in philosophical terms (particularly ontology, the study of being), refers to the sum total of all that exists independently of human perception, thought, or language—the fundamental “what is” of the universe. It encompasses everything knowable or existent, whether through empirical observation, logical inference, or other means, and is often contrasted with illusion, appearance, or mere possibility.

Key debates include:

  • Realism: Reality is mind-independent (e.g., physical objects exist whether observed or not), as in scientific realism.
  • Idealism: Reality is fundamentally mental or idea-based (e.g., George Berkeley’s “to be is to be perceived”).
  • Phenomenalism: Reality consists of sensory experiences, without committing to unobservable entities.

Unlike truth (which is about accurate representation), reality is the “stuff” being represented, substantive existence that doesn’t require proof to be, though philosophy probes its nature endlessly.

Defining Truth in Philosophy

In philosophy, truth is generally understood as a property of statements, beliefs, propositions, or thoughts that accurately represent or align with the way the world is. The most influential and traditional account is the correspondence theory of truth, which posits that a statement is true if it corresponds to an objective fact or state of affairs in reality, for example, “Snow is white” is true because it matches the observable property of snow. This view traces back to ancient thinkers like Aristotle, who described truth as: “to say of what is that it is, and of what is not that it is not.”

However, philosophy offers several competing theories of truth, reflecting debates about its nature:

Theory Core Idea Key Proponents
Correspondence Truth is a match between a proposition and the world. Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, Bertrand Russell
Coherence Truth is what coheres or fits consistently within a system of beliefs. Hegel, Brand Blanshard
Pragmatic Truth is what proves useful or works in practice over time. William James, John Dewey
Deflationary Truth is not a deep property; saying “P is true” just asserts P. Alfred Tarski, Paul Horwich

These theories highlight that truth is not a monolithic concept but a subject of ongoing contention, often tied to broader questions in metaphysics, epistemology, and logic.

Religions often conceptualize truth in ways that intersect with the above philosophical theories, though these alignments are interpretive and not always explicit in doctrines.The following chart shows how Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Daoism, Zen (as a branch of Mahayana Buddhism), and Hinduism align with the four main theories:

Alignment of Religions with Theories of Truth

Religion Correspondence Theory Coherence Theory Pragmatic Theory Deflationary Theory
Judaism Partial alignment: Revelation (e.g., Torah at Sinai) conveys objective truths about God and reality, such as moral norms corresponding to divine order and human nature (e.g., post-Fall ethical boundaries in Genesis). However, critiques highlight limitations, as strict correspondence might deem metaphorical Biblical narratives "false" if not matching literal facts. Strong alignment: Emphasizes systematic integration of wisdom and norms (e.g., Torah as a pre-creation blueprint for a cohesive philosophical system); multiplicity and controversy (e.g., in liturgy like the Four Sons ) cohere within a unified telos of divine service, preventing isolated "discoveries." Strong alignment: Torah viewed as "useful" for navigating life holistically, proving true through practical benefits like advancing human flourishing and ethical patterns (e.g., interpretive history as adaptive language for coping, per pragmatic philosophers like Dewey). Moderate alignment: Faith as a "family resemblance" (including doubt and protest, e.g., Job) deflates essentialist definitions; afterlife views (e.g., Maimonides' intellectual survival) emphasize knowledge without fixed dualisms.
Christianity Strong alignment: Revelation attests to objective facts about God (e.g., Incarnation, moral perfection); truths like divine hiddenness correspond to reality, with science-religion harmony reflecting empirical correspondence. Strong alignment: Balances paradoxes (e.g., Kierkegaard's leap of faith) and tensions (e.g., Problem of Evil for moral values) within a coherent system; ethics cohere divine and human natures (Chalcedonian Creed). Strong alignment: Faith as lived disposition (cognitive-affective-conative) toward God, "working" through practical responses like hope and "what would Jesus do?"; inward acts and service prove truth via outcomes. Indirect alignment: Natural law as flourishing without imposed essence; faith beyond propositional belief (e.g., Mother Teresa's doubt) deflates strict knowledge claims.
Islam Strong alignment: Eternal divine speech (Qur'an) reflects objective relations and content; moral truths (e.g., Ashʿarī voluntarism) correspond to God's will as criterion. Strong alignment: Integrates philosophy and inner states (e.g., heart/Qalb insight) for stability; ethics cohere mutual impacts of reason and revelation. Strong alignment: Revelation's utility in soul purification and action (e.g., love as transformative benevolence); faith as practical response, even non-doxastic. Moderate alignment: Rejects exhaustive categories (e.g., non-evidentialist faith); knowledge via intuition deflates mediating intellects in mysticism.
Daoism (Taoism) Weak alignment: The Dao as the natural way may correspond to observable patterns in reality (e.g., cycles of change), but its fluidity and emphasis on harmony over fixed facts limits strict matching to "states of affairs." Moderate alignment: Truth emerges from balancing opposites (yin-yang) and internal consistency with nature; texts like the Dao De Jing promote a cohesive system of simplicity and non-contention. Strong alignment: Truth is what "works" in practice, such as wu-wei (effortless action) leading to effective, harmonious living; the Dao is verified by its utility in adapting to life's flow without force. Strong alignment: The Dao is ineffable ("The Dao that can be told is not the eternal Dao"), deflating truth to a minimal, non-descriptive concept beyond words or essence, focusing on direct experience over substantive properties.
Zen (Buddhism) Weak alignment: Rejects exhaustive facts; conventional truths accept everyday phenomena, but ultimate truth (emptiness) avoids direct correspondence to inherent realities. Moderate alignment: Two truths (conventional/ultimate) cohere through consistency with experience and evidence; catuṣkoṭi logic allows paraconsistent views. Strong alignment: Truth verified by practical results (e.g., meditation reducing suffering); rebirth/karma as useful fictions for ethics; openness to science (e.g., Dalai Lama's adaptations). Strong alignment: Truth as lack of essence (sunyata); omniscience as perceptual insight, not propositional; humility and "behaving as if" deflate deep claims.
Hinduism Moderate alignment: Aligns with observed phenomena (e.g., Vedic empiricism) and scriptural testimony (śruti); non-dual unity (Brahman) corresponds to ultimate reality. Strong alignment: Pluralism (one truth, many descriptions) coheres diverse interpretations with Vedas; dharma as situational consistency. Strong alignment: Truth in debate and practices promoting well-being (e.g., mokṣa via insight); pragmatic belief in reincarnation for virtues; adaptability to reason/science. Moderate alignment: Epistemic humility (unknowable origins); anti-essentialism (family resemblances); maya as illusion deflates fixed essences.
Sikhism Strong alignment: Truth (sach/Sat) stands for God as the Eternal Existence and ultimate reality; scriptures like the Guru Granth Sahib correspond to divine truths and objective moral principles. Strong alignment: Sikh teachings integrate philosophy, ethics, and practice into a cohesive system emphasizing unity (Ik Onkar), equality, and consistent moral living. Strong alignment: True knowledge is a lived experience through truthful living, meditation, and ethical actions, leading to spiritual growth and liberation. Moderate alignment: Truth is timeless and ineffable, beyond temporal bounds and linguistic limitations, focusing on direct intuition and experience rather than substantive metaphysical properties.
Go Back Home to TOV