Any questions ?

Please email questions to shalom@tov/com

Welcome to TOV

Read from right to left, TOV (טוֹב) is a rich and deeply meaningful Hebrew word that translates simply as “good” in English. It carries a broad range of everyday and biblical meanings, referring to things that humans regard as life-giving, morally excellent, or fulfilling the purpose for which they were intended. 

 

The physical universe contains matter, energy, living organisms, and events. Human consciousness adds something different: meaning and value. A star is not morally good. A molecule is not evil. Human beings observe the world, experience pleasure and suffering, imagine alternatives, and assign words such as good and evil to what they experience.

 

Where did the idea of TOV come from? How do human beings decide what is good? Why do their answers differ so dramatically? And what happens when those answers are organized into religions, political doctrines, moral systems, and ideologies?

טוֹב

Physical Reality 

TOV IS NOT A PART OF THIS REALITY

Where did TOV come from?

TOV is not something we discover by looking into space or through a microscope. The sounds, symbols, and meanings associated with the word emerged from human consciousness and were transmitted through language across generations.

The written forms that eventually produced Hebrew developed through the long history of alphabetic writing in the ancient Near East. Early alphabetic systems were fashioned by Semitic-speaking peoples who adapted elements of Egyptian writing into simpler signs representing speech sounds. Later Canaanite, Phoenician, Paleo-Hebrew, Aramaic, and Jewish scribal traditions carried those alphabetic forms forward until they developed into the Hebrew letters familiar today.

 

Their TOV probably sounded more like TWB, if you are able to imagine the vowels you need to say it in English.

The precise ancient pronunciation changed over time, as pronunciations always do. What matters here is more remarkable than phonetic reconstruction: an abstraction formed in human minds thousands of years ago can still be written, spoken, recognized, debated, and transmitted from one consciousness to another.
Language made that continuity possible. Without the human capacity to attach shared meanings to sounds and symbols, accumulated knowledge would disappear with each generation. Civilization depends upon our ability to preserve ideas outside a single human lifetime.

 

If all we could do is bark like dogs, we would  have never evolved to create complex human civilization. 

Reality Emerging from Consciousness

Consciousness

Consciousness extends far down the ladder of life. Mammals, birds, fish, reptiles, and even many insects respond to their surroundings in ways that imply perception, learning, memory, and preference. Human consciousness, however, developed an extraordinary additional capacity for symbolic language and the cumulative transmission of knowledge.


Language, music, mathematics, art, myth, religion, philosophy, science, and technology are products of that cumulative process. Knowledge passing from person to person across centuries has produced cities, universities, antibiotics, chemotherapy, aircraft, computers, and artificial intelligence.


Artificial intelligence exists objectively as hardware, software, stored information, and measurable computational processes. Whether machines can ever possess consciousness is a separate question.


Human consciousness creates a subjective world of beliefs, religions, philosophies, and ideologies that functions as a set of internal roadmaps. Through them we construct meaning, establish values, interpret our experiences, and decide how human beings ought to live.
Unlike the physical world, which is constrained by empirical facts and natural laws, these systems of meaning are shaped by history, culture, psychology, experience, and choice. They make cooperation on an enormous scale possible, but they can also turn disagreement into conflict.

 

On balance, ideologies give us a sporadically logical world of benign cooperation cursed by illogical malevolent conflict.

Ideologies Emerging from Consciousness

Ideologies

The word ideology in English evolved from the original French idéologie, meaning the “science of ideas.” Now it has come to be a catch-all for ideas, beliefs, doctrines,  philosophies, worldviews, and dogma that people adopt to guild their lives and to force others to share their ideologies.

 

Politically, ideologies include systems such as liberal democracy, constitutionalism, socialism, communism, nationalism, libertarianism, and theocracy. Socially and morally, they include beliefs about culture, equality, fairness, rights, obligations, religion, family, and the relationship between the individual and the community.

 

The problem is not that human beings possess ideologies. We probably cannot organize complex societies without shared ideas. Ideologies can inspire abolition, constitutional government, toleration, scientific inquiry, philanthropy, and human rights. They can also justify dictatorship, racial supremacy, religious persecution, political terror, and mass murder.

 

Human beings are bound by physics and biology, but our ideologies are not physical laws. They are products of consciousness, history, ethical judgment, and institutional development. They are rarely perfectly logical or internally coherent, and no ideology is made true merely because millions of people believe it.

 

Logic and coherence are related but not identical. Logic supplies rules for valid reasoning and avoiding contradiction. Coherence asks whether the parts of a worldview fit together and support one another. Neither alone tells us whether an ideology produces a society in which human beings flourish.

 

That requires another test. To the extent that an ideology is life-giving, reduces unnecessary suffering, protects human agency, encourages cooperation, and allows people to fulfill constructive purposes, we may reasonably call its consequences good. When an ideology systematically produces needless suffering, coercion, degradation, or destruction, we encounter what human beings have long called evil.

 

Andrew Heywood’s Political Ideologies: An Introduction

The Problem of Good and Evil

 

The “Problem of Good and Evil,” frequently called the Problem of Evil, is the philosophical and theological puzzle of how to reconcile the reality of suffering and wickedness in the world with the idea of a God who is all-knowing, all-powerful, and completely good. If God can stop evil and wants to stop evil, why does evil still exist?

 

Theodicy is the branch of philosophy and theology that attempts to defend God’s goodness and power in the face of suffering and evil. Historically, theology is one reason people have  waged war against each other.  What does the Problem of Evil look like if we eliminate theodicy from the discussion? Without a divine judge, good and evil are redefined through human experience, biology, and social survival.

  • Evolution and Survival: Humans are social animals. Cooperation, empathy, and altruism (good) helped our ancestors survive in groups. Cruelty, murder, and theft (evil) destroy social trust and threaten human survival.

  • The Concept of Harm: In secular terms, “evil” is redefined as the intentional infliction of unnecessary suffering on conscious beings. “Good” is actions that promote well-being, health, and happiness.

  • The Social Contract: Society functions as an unspoken agreement. Individuals agree not to harm others in exchange for not being harmed themselves. Morality is the ruleset that keeps this contract alive.

  • Rationality and Reason: Philosophers like Immanuel Kant argued that morality is a matter of pure logic. You do not need God to realize that a society where everyone lies or steals eventually collapses.

Good and Evil

Contemporary Manifestations of Evil

Totalitarian communist/Marxist-Leninist ideologies have historically inflicted the largest scale of intentional, unnecessary suffering and death, followed by fascist/Nazi ethno-nationalism, with Islamist theocratic and jihadist ideologies currently producing the most concentrated ongoing intentional violence against civilians. These patterns emerge from democide data (government murder of civilians outside battlefield deaths), war-related excess deaths tied to ideology, and terrorism statistics rather than from abstract moralizing.

 

In the 21st century the largest ongoing sources of intentional civilian suffering tied to ideology are Islamist movements and regimes. Jihadist groups (Islamic State and affiliates, Taliban, Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab, Al-Qaeda networks, Hamas, etc.) have driven the majority of global terrorism deaths for years. Global Terrorism Index and related tallies show Islamist actors responsible for the bulk of recent terrorism fatalities; one long-run count attributes roughly 250,000 deaths to Islamist attacks since 1979. 

 

Theocratic or Islamist-authoritarian states (Iran’s export of revolutionary ideology and proxies, Taliban Afghanistan, elements of Sudanese and Sahel conflicts) combine governance by rigid religious law with deliberate targeting of minorities, apostates, women under certain interpretations, and political opponents. Practices such as public executions, slavery (ISIS), forced conversions, and systematic sexual violence meet the definition of intentional unnecessary suffering.

 

Related ethno-religious conflicts (parts of the Sahel, Nigeria, Yemen, Syria) frequently feature Islamist framing that elevates group purity or apocalyptic goals over minimizing civilian harm.

 

The ideologies that generate the most evil share structural features more than specific theological or economic content. Utopian or eschatological claims justify present suffering as the price of a perfected future (classless society, pure race, caliphate, end-times purification, Twelver Shiite Eschatology).

Fanatical variants of fascism, communism, and religious fundamentalism together account for the majority of large-scale mass-violence deaths since 1800. Ordinary human vices (greed, tribalism, status-seeking) exist everywhere; ideologies amplify them by providing moral permission and organizational capacity for industrial-scale or systematic infliction of suffering. Industrial-scale capabilities are what make the Islamic Republic of Iran so dangerous, not only in the middle east, but to the West in general. They have declared the West to be the great Satan and Israel the little Satan, and have vowed the destruction of both. We ignore them to our peril.

Shattered World

How Do We Recognize a Good Society?

 

If morality is interpreted through human consciousness rather than imposed by an unquestionable divine or ideological authority, a difficult problem remains: by what standard can one society be judged better than another?

 

Perfection cannot be the standard. No nation is free of injustice, bad leaders, prejudice, corruption, war, or tragic mistakes. A more useful test is whether a society contains institutions that reduce the damage human beings can do to one another and mechanisms that allow errors to be exposed and corrected without destroying the society itself.

 

A good society therefore protects the individual against arbitrary power. It recognizes some sphere of conscience, speech, religion, property, association, and private life that neither the majority nor the government may casually invade. It subjects rulers to law, permits political opposition, provides peaceful mechanisms for replacing leaders, and allows citizens to criticize the institutions under which they live.

 

It also makes disagreement survivable. People of different religions, ethnicities, political parties, and moral traditions do not need to agree about ultimate truth in order to cooperate. They need rules that allow them to pursue different visions of the good while restraining them from imposing those visions on others through force, fraud, intimidation, or arbitrary state power.

 

Such a society will still argue bitterly. Indeed, visible disagreement can be evidence of freedom rather than decay. Courts will reverse governments, newspapers will condemn leaders, voters will remove parties from office, demonstrations will fill the streets, and citizens will accuse one another of being profoundly wrong. The essential question is whether those conflicts are processed through institutions instead of through systematic political violence.

 

Finally, a good society creates conditions in which knowledge, enterprise, science, education, medicine, culture, and voluntary cooperation can flourish. Its institutions are valuable not because they guarantee wise outcomes, but because they allow millions of fallible people to learn, create, exchange, disagree, correct mistakes, and improve their lives.

 

The test of a society is not whether it claims to embody TOV. The test is what happens to human beings when they live under its rules.

TOV in the Real World – Why America and Israel Are Stronger Together

If good and evil are products of human judgment, does that mean that every ideology is equally valid and that every society is merely different from every other?


No.


We can judge an ideology by what happens when human beings attempt to live under it. Does it protect life or casually sacrifice it? Does it permit people to think, speak, worship, create and disagree? Does it restrain the power of government? Does it allow peaceful political opposition? Does it encourage cooperation and human flourishing, or does it divide humanity into believers and infidels, rulers and subjects, approved classes and condemned ones?

 

America and Israel Are Stronger Together